After seeing that Ampersand linked me (which, OMG SQUEE, by the way. Just saying.) and then seeing Crazy Tracy’s response detailing her own ECT and how it’s been beneficial to her, and finally seeing flawedplan’s response to Amp and Tracy, I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about what I said, and what they said, and etc.
First, and I apologize if what I said could have been misinterpreted, I don’t want to crusade against ECT, and I don’t wish necessarily to end the practice entirely. However, I don’t think it (or any other treatment or medication) should be forced on anyone, and I do feel that people who voluntarily consent should at the very least be aware of the risks. I also do not wish to belittle or ignore anyone’s positive experience with the treatment.
Second, I really was intrigued by what flawedplan had to say about whether or not there is a cohesive mental health blogging community, and if there is, whether or not it could come together for activism or credibly lend its voice to the larger progressive community:
If progressives are to take up psychiatric rights it’s the stakeholder’s job to meet them halfway. We have to be directive, and “on message.” Maybe I’m kidding myself and there is no real c/s/x community, but for the sake of argument, let’s say we have something going on. How do we get out of the ghetto? What can we do? What are we doing?
It’s tricky to urge social activists to take up yet another cause, and when people with no stake in a battle do their homework, give it time and attention, promulgate the scholarship and rally around in agreement, it is to celebrate. Strength in numbers, the consolidation of power, hope and possibility springs up.
[...]
Standpoint theorists maintain that people in the same social group will share the same perspective.
Generally true, except when it isn’t. There’s nothing wrong with generalizing experience, the question is what to do with the fly in the ointment. There’s one in every crowd.
And the one right now in this crowd seems to be ECT. But, we have all sorts of other ones too, like pro-med/anti-med, pro-CBT/anti-CBT, even pro-disorder/anti-disorder. Yes, for those of you on the outside, some of us are still arguing about whether or not these disorders are even disorders!
However, then I think about the feminist community. You have pro-sex/anti-sex, pro-porn/anti-porn, pro-marriage/anti-marriage, and even pro-choice/pro-life battles still raging. People over there argue that those battles keep feminists from being recognized at large. And yet, Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan get picked to work for John Edwards and Amanda has a book deal, Jessica Valenti is on The Colbert Report and has published a book, and Jill Filipovic blogs for the Huffington Post. Clearly, feminism works despite its internal differences.
What makes us different? As flawedplan says, “We’re a minority population, many have criminal justice histories, psychiatric abuse is below the radar, and engaging the material makes people uncomfortable.” There’s a huge stigma attached to many of us just because of who we are. However, there’s also stigma involved with being a racial minority, a religious minority, and any other minority one can name, and yet their concerns, the concerns of blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, transgendered people and gays, are on the radar. Why not ours? In my opinion, there’s only one reason: we are not a cohesive community yet. We can’t mobilize because we have no common creed.
I think part of the reason for that is because mental illness treatment is so individual and conditions manifest so differently in a lot of people. I also think that activism is a lot on top of the things we normally have to face. Does the physical disability blogging community also have these problems? I honestly don’t know, but I would guess they do.
So, I guess I’ll finish by saying that I share flawedplan’s sentiment. We cannot afford to divide because there aren’t enough of us who have the luxury of being activists. (Not that we all have to agree, but we can’t flounce away with our toys, so to speak.) We need to try to unite, even while we disagree, to work toward goals we all believe in.